Fed's Barkin Casts Doubt on Productivity-Led Rate Cuts
Richmond Fed's Barkin tempers rate cut hopes, questioning if productivity gains can tame inflation as in the 1990s.
Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin on Tuesday tempered expectations that a productivity boom could clear the way for further interest rate cuts, highlighting a critical debate taking shape at the U.S. central bank. While acknowledging that rising productivity is helping ease cost pressures for businesses, he expressed skepticism that the trend is strong enough to fundamentally alter the inflation outlook.
Gauging the Productivity Surge
The debate centers on recent economic data. Productivity saw a sharp jump of nearly 5% in the third quarter of 2025, a figure that has fueled arguments for a more dovish monetary policy.
However, Barkin urged caution, pointing out that productivity is a volatile and imperfectly measured metric. He suggested that the four-quarter average, which he estimates to be around 2%, offers a more reliable gauge of the underlying trend. While this represents an improvement over recent years, it falls short of the kind of explosive growth that could single-handedly tame inflation.
"I do think productivity is up," Barkin told reporters. "The hard part with productivity, of course, is it's not perfectly measured."
He added that while he is open to the idea of sustained improvement, he remains unconvinced of a more robust growth outlook for now. "We may get more information over time... that what we saw in the third quarter is actually continuing," Barkin said. "That would be awesome. But I think you want to kind of see."
A Key Debate for Fed Policy
Higher productivity allows companies to increase output with fewer resources, reducing the need to pass on costs to consumers through higher prices. This dynamic is central to the case being made by figures like Fed chief nominee Kevin Warsh and current Fed Governor Stephen Miran. They argue that technological advances, particularly in artificial intelligence, could unleash enough productivity to warrant further rate cuts, even with inflation still running about a percentage point above the Fed's 2% target.
Barkin acknowledged that productivity gains, combined with deregulation and tax cuts, could bolster the economy. However, he pushed back against direct comparisons to a pivotal moment in Fed history.
Why This Isn't a Repeat of the 1990s
Barkin argued that the current economic environment is fundamentally different from the one former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan navigated in the 1990s. At that time, Greenspan famously resisted calls to raise interest rates, betting correctly that the emerging computer technology boom would fuel non-inflationary growth.
Barkin outlined the key distinctions:
• The 1990s: Demand was strong, but inflation was not a significant concern.
• Today: Demand is not as robust, while inflation remains stubbornly high and has not improved over the past year.
"In their case, demand was quite strong... but inflation wasn't. In our case, demand is not as strong, and inflation is higher," Barkin explained. "It is just a different conversation." He stressed that the public is now contending with a five-year period where the central bank has missed its inflation target.
The Logic Behind Pausing Rate Cuts
This persistent inflation is a primary reason the Federal Reserve paused its rate-cutting cycle last week. Policymakers are concerned that an extended period of high prices could become embedded in public psychology, making it harder to bring inflation back down.
"Inflation... still remains above our target. That's been the case since 2021," Barkin said. "I take this sustained miss seriously... Today's inflation numbers, regardless of the 'why,' significantly influence tomorrow's inflation."
Although Barkin is not a voting member of the Fed's policy committee this year, his perspective aligns with the central bank's current wait-and-see approach as it monitors incoming data on the economy, labor market, and prices.
Looking ahead to 2026, the Richmond Fed president said he expects the economy to stay resilient, supported by "significant stimulus" from deregulation and tax reductions. He noted that business leaders remain confident, reporting that "demand is fine," making it unlikely that consumers or companies will pull back on spending.


